netdev - Re: [G[PATCH 1/2][ENETLINK] max cmd boundary chec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061201124903.GE8693@postel.suug.ch>
Date:	Fri, 1 Dec 2006 13:49:03 +0100
From:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [G[PATCH 1/2][ENETLINK] max cmd boundary chec

* jamal <hadi@...erus.ca> 2006-12-01 06:30
> hopefully no mime crap
> cheers,
> jamal

> [GENETLINK] max cmd boundary check
> 
> We need to boundary check for commands being registered.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim<hadi@...erus.ca>

I can't see why this should be required. genl_register_ops()
enforces a unique command id and genl_ops->cmd is u8 so
there is no way to register more than 256 commands anyway.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html