netdev - Re: [PATCH][XFRM] Optimize policy dumping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1165241469.3664.81.camel@localhost>
Date:	Mon, 04 Dec 2006 09:11:09 -0500
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][XFRM] Optimize policy dumping

On Mon, 2006-04-12 at 15:06 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:

> Both ways are fine I guess. But the counting has almost no
> overhead with the patch I sent, so I'm not sure if its worth
> adding a callback (which still needs to get the last policy/SA
> as argument, so that part won't get any nicer).
> 
> BTW, I'm not sure whether there are further requirements than
> those you quoted, but according to that text, using 1 for
> all but the last message would be fine as well :)
> 

The only arguement for the callback is it will lead to eventually
having some semi-reliable dump for pfkey. But i think that is a separate
issue to be tackled later.
I am actually scratching my head a little as to what happens when the
pfkey socket recv is full.

cheers,
jamal

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html