[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200612041819.01017.dim@openvz.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 18:19:00 +0300
From: Dmitry Mishin <dim@...nvz.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: hadi@...erus.ca, Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>,
devel@...nvz.org, Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Cedric Goater <clg@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Network virtualization/isolation
On Sunday 03 December 2006 19:00, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Ok. Just a quick summary of where I see the discussion.
>
> We all agree that L2 isolation is needed at some point.
As we all agreed on this, may be it is time to send patches one-by-one?
For the beggining, I propose to resend Cedric's empty namespace patch as base
for others - it is really empty, but necessary in order to move further.
After this patch and the following net namespace unshare patch will be
accepted, I could send network devices virtualization patches for review and
discussion.
What do you think?
>
> The approaches discussed for L2 and L3 are sufficiently orthogonal
> that we can implement then in either order. You would need to
> unshare L3 to unshare L2, but if we think of them as two separate
> namespaces we are likely to be in better shape.
>
> The L3 discussion still has the problem that there has not been
> agreement on all of the semantics yet.
>
> More comments after I get some sleep.
>
> Eric
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Thanks,
Dmitry.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists