[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1fybvu0k9.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 08:45:42 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Dmitry Mishin <dim@...nvz.org>
Cc: hadi@...erus.ca, Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>,
devel@...nvz.org, Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Cedric Goater <clg@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Network virtualization/isolation
Dmitry Mishin <dim@...nvz.org> writes:
> On Sunday 03 December 2006 19:00, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Ok. Just a quick summary of where I see the discussion.
>>
>> We all agree that L2 isolation is needed at some point.
> As we all agreed on this, may be it is time to send patches one-by-one?
> For the beggining, I propose to resend Cedric's empty namespace patch as base
> for others - it is really empty, but necessary in order to move further.
>
> After this patch and the following net namespace unshare patch will be
> accepted, I could send network devices virtualization patches for review and
> discussion.
>
> What do you think?
I think sending out these patches for review sounds great.
For merge order I think enabling the unshare/clone flags to anyone
but developers should be about the last thing we do.
Starting with clone/unshare sounds to me like hitching up the cart
before it is built.
I really need to focus on finishing up the pid namespace, so except
for a little review and conversation I'm not going to help much on the
network side.
Of course I need to mess with unix domain sockets to properly
implement the pid namespace. Because of the pid credential passing.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists