[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1k6178uoz.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 09:58:04 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at>
Cc: Dmitry Mishin <dim@...nvz.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, hadi@...erus.ca,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>
Subject: Re: Network virtualization/isolation
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 06:19:00PM +0300, Dmitry Mishin wrote:
>> On Sunday 03 December 2006 19:00, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> > Ok. Just a quick summary of where I see the discussion.
>> >
>> > We all agree that L2 isolation is needed at some point.
>
>> As we all agreed on this, may be it is time to send patches
>> one-by-one? For the beggining, I propose to resend Cedric's
>> empty namespace patch as base for others - it is really empty,
>> but necessary in order to move further.
>>
>> After this patch and the following net namespace unshare
>> patch will be accepted,
>
> well, I have neither seen any performance tests showing
> that the following is true:
>
> - no change on network performance without the
> space enabled
> - no change on network performance on the host
> with the network namespaces enabled
> - no measureable overhead inside the network
> namespace
> - good scaleability for a larger number of network
> namespaces
Yes all important criteria for selecting the implementation.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists