[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <457454CF.7040308@trash.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 18:03:11 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>
CC: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: RFC: consistent disable_xfrm behaviour
Alexey Kuznetsov wrote:
> Hello!
>
>
>>Alexey, do you remember what the original intent of this was?
>
>
> disable_policy was supposed to skip policy checks on input.
> It makes sense only on input device.
>
> disable_xfrm was supposed to skip transformations on output.
> It makes sense only on output device.
>
> If it does not work, it was done wrong. :-)
>
> As I see it, root of the problem is that DST_NOXFRM flag
> is calculated using wrong device. out_dev should be used
> in __mkroute_input(). It looks as a cut-n-paste error, the code
> was taken from output path, where it is correct.
Thanks, thats exactly what I suspected :)
Here's the patch again properly signed off.
View attachment "x" of type "text/plain" (975 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists