[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45777A0C.4010901@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 18:18:52 -0800
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: shemminger@...l.org, muli@...ibm.com, jeff@...zik.org,
amitkale@...xen.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, brazilnut@...ibm.com,
netxenproj@...syssoft.com, rob@...xen.com, romieu@...zoreil.com,
sanjeev@...xen.com, wendyx@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: network devices don't handle pci_dma_mapping_error()'s
David Miller wrote:
> From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>
> Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:58:35 -0800
>
>
>>The more robust way would be to stop the queue (like flow control)
>>and return busy. You would need a timer though to handle the case
>>where some disk i/o stole all the mappings and then network device flow
>>blocked.
>
>
> You need some kind of fairness, yes, that's why I suggested a
> callback. When your DMA allocation fails, you get into the rear of
> the FIFO, when a free occurs, we callback starting from the head of
> the FIFO. You don't get removed from the FIFO unless at least one of
> your DMA allocation retries succeed.
While tossing a TCP|UDP|SCTP|etc packet could be plusungood, especially
if the IOMMU fills frequently (for some suitable definiton of
frequently), is it really worth the effort to save say an ACK?
rick jones
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists