netdev - Re: [PATCH] bonding: change spinlocks and remove timers in favor of workqueues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bdfc5d6e0612070525u320b0b65j161819b730e3b9ac@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 7 Dec 2006 08:25:14 -0500
From:	"Andy Gospodarek" <andy@...yhouse.net>
To:	"Jay Vosburgh" <fubar@...ibm.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: change spinlocks and remove timers in favor of workqueues

On 12/7/06, Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com> wrote:
>
>         I don't see a problem in starting with your patch; the end state
> will be sufficiently different (e.g., the four workqueues would
> ultimately be consolidated into one) that it's still a good testbed to
> start with.

My patch actually only uses a single workqueue for each bond (almost
exactly like yours in-fact) with 4 different types of work that can be
placed on it.

>
>         The only other minor issue is that after this week, I will be
> off for the holidays (and far, far away from email) for the next month.
>

Good to know.

>         -J
>
> ---
>         -Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@...ibm.com
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html