netdev - Re: [NETLINK]: Restore API compatibility of address and neighbour bits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4579A1FE.1040200@jg555.com>
Date:	Fri, 08 Dec 2006 09:33:50 -0800
From:	Jim Gifford <maillist@...55.com>
To:	Stefan Rompf <stefan@...lof.de>
CC:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	dwmw2@...radead.org, joseph@...esourcery.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, libc-alpha@...rceware.org, akpm@...l.org
Subject: Re: [NETLINK]: Restore API compatibility of address and neighbour
  bits

I have seen issues with some version of unifdef remove any instance of 
__KERNEL__, is the #ifndef __KERNEL__ really necessary. Has anyone 
tested to make sure the install_headers will not accidently remove this?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html