netdev - Re: [PATCH] ieee80211softmac: Fix errors related to the work

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200612101940.48996.mb@bu3sch.de>
Date:	Sun, 10 Dec 2006 19:40:48 +0100
From:	Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
To:	Ulrich Kunitz <kune@...ne-taler.de>
Cc:	dsd@...too.org, Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ieee80211softmac: Fix errors related to the work_struct changes

On Sunday 10 December 2006 19:35, Ulrich Kunitz wrote:
> On 06-12-10 18:49 Michael Buesch wrote:
> 
> > On Sunday 10 December 2006 18:39, Ulrich Kunitz wrote:
> > > The signature of work functions changed recently from a context
> > > pointer to the work structure pointer. This caused a problem in
> > > the ieee80211softmac code, because the ieee80211softmac_assox_work
> > > function has  been called directly with a parameter explicitly
> > > casted to (void*). This compiled correctly but resulted in a
> > > softlock, because mutex_lock was called with the wrong memory
> > > address. The patch fixes the problem. Another issue was a wrong
> > > call of the schedule_work function. Softmac works again and this
> > > fixes the problem I mentioned earlier in the zd1211rw rx tasklet
> > > patch. The patch is against Linus' tree (commit af1713e0).
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Ulrich Kunitz <kune@...ne-taler.de>
> > > ---
> > >  net/ieee80211/softmac/ieee80211softmac_assoc.c |    6 +++---
> > >  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/net/ieee80211/softmac/ieee80211softmac_assoc.c b/net/ieee80211/softmac/ieee80211softmac_assoc.c
> > > index eec1a1d..a824852 100644
> > > --- a/net/ieee80211/softmac/ieee80211softmac_assoc.c
> > > +++ b/net/ieee80211/softmac/ieee80211softmac_assoc.c
> > > @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static void
> > >  ieee80211softmac_assoc_notify_scan(struct net_device *dev, int event_type, void *context)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct ieee80211softmac_device *mac = ieee80211_priv(dev);
> > > -	ieee80211softmac_assoc_work((void*)mac);
> > > +	ieee80211softmac_assoc_work(&mac->associnfo.work.work);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  static void
> > > @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ ieee80211softmac_assoc_notify_auth(struc
> > >  
> > >  	switch (event_type) {
> > >  	case IEEE80211SOFTMAC_EVENT_AUTHENTICATED:
> > > -		ieee80211softmac_assoc_work((void*)mac);
> > > +		ieee80211softmac_assoc_work(&mac->associnfo.work.work);
> > >  		break;
> > >  	case IEEE80211SOFTMAC_EVENT_AUTH_FAILED:
> > >  	case IEEE80211SOFTMAC_EVENT_AUTH_TIMEOUT:
> > > @@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ ieee80211softmac_try_reassoc(struct ieee
> > >  
> > >  	spin_lock_irqsave(&mac->lock, flags);
> > >  	mac->associnfo.associating = 1;
> > > -	schedule_work(&mac->associnfo.work);
> > > +	schedule_delayed_work(&mac->associnfo.work, 0);
> > 
> > Why do you use a zero delay here? What does that fix?
> > 
> 
> The problem is that you there are now different work structures:
> struct work_struct and struct delayed_work. The quick fix seems to
> have been to change all old work_structs as associnfo's work to
> delayed_work. The way the structures are designed calling
> schedule_work or schedule_delayed_work doesn't matter, but you
> will get a gcc warning, because the pointer types are not
> identical. This change works around the warning in the same way as
> the other schedule_work calls for associnfo's work.
> 
> I'm not sure, whether the breaking of the workqueue API is really
> worth it. What I see is that the change introduced choices and
> choices make things more complex.

Ah, ok. Thanks for the clarification. In this case this patch is
ACKed as well.

-- 
Greetings Michael.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html