netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/3] d80211: fix workqueue breakage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061213191330.450865b1@griffin.suse.cz>
Date:	Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:13:30 +0100
From:	Jiri Benc <jbenc@...e.cz>
To:	Michael Wu <flamingice@...rmilk.net>
Cc:	John Linville <linville@...driver.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] d80211: fix workqueue breakage

On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:55:53 -0500, Michael Wu wrote:
> -			schedule_work(&local->scan_work);
> +			schedule_work(&local->scan_work.work);

Hm, what is the preferred way here:
schedule_work(some_delayed_work.work)
or
schedule_delayed_work(some_delayed_work, 0)?
	
The result is the same, I just would like to know what is preferred so
next time when workqueues are rewritten ;-) we have fewer troubles.

Thanks,

 Jiri

-- 
Jiri Benc
SUSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html