[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061214170737.GS4329@austin.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:07:37 -0600
From: linas@...tin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas)
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, jgarzik@...ox.com,
Ishizaki Kou <kou.ishizaki@...hiba.co.jp>,
Jens Osterkamp <Jens.Osterkamp@....de>,
James K Lewis <jim@...ewis.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/14] Spidernet DMA coalescing
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 11:05:17AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 03:06:59PM -0600, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> >
> > The current driver code performs 512 DMA mappings of a bunch of
> > 32-byte ring descriptor structures. This is silly, as they are
> > all in contiguous memory. This patch changes the code to
> > dma_map_coherent() each rx/tx ring as a whole.
>
> It's acutally dma_alloc_coherent now that you updated the patch :)
>
> > + chain->ring = dma_alloc_coherent(&card->pdev->dev, alloc_size,
> > + &chain->dma_addr, GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > + if (!chain->ring)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > + descr = chain->ring;
> > + memset(descr, 0, alloc_size);
>
> dma_alloc_coherent is defined to zero the allocated memory, so you
> won't need this memset.
Being unclear on the concept, should a send a new version of this patch,
or should I send a new patch that removes this?
--linas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists