[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061214173534.GA3452@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:35:34 +0000
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Linas Vepstas <linas@...tin.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, jgarzik@...ox.com,
Ishizaki Kou <kou.ishizaki@...hiba.co.jp>,
Jens Osterkamp <Jens.Osterkamp@....de>,
James K Lewis <jim@...ewis.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/14] Spidernet DMA coalescing
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 11:07:37AM -0600, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> Being unclear on the concept, should a send a new version of this patch,
> or should I send a new patch that removes this?
For just the memset issue an incremental patch would be fine. But given
the small mistake in the patch description a resend with the fixed
description mighrt be in order here.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists