[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061215125518.c2bfee56.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 12:55:18 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] smc911x: fix netpoll compilation faliure
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:13:28 +0300
Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com> wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> the trivial patch below fixes the compilation failure for smc911x.c when NET_POLL_CONTROLLER is set.
>
> drivers/net/smc911x.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/smc911x.c b/drivers/net/smc911x.c
> index 2c43433..797ab91 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/smc911x.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/smc911x.c
> @@ -1331,7 +1331,7 @@ smc911x_rx_dma_irq(int dma, void *data)
> static void smc911x_poll_controller(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> disable_irq(dev->irq);
> - smc911x_interrupt(dev->irq, dev, NULL);
> + smc911x_interrupt(dev->irq, dev);
> enable_irq(dev->irq);
> }
> #endif
That's a 2.6.19 fix, yes?
It looks like this driver needs a 2.6.20 fix also...
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Teach this driver about the workqueue changes.
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
---
drivers/net/smc911x.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff -puN drivers/net/smc911x.c~smc911-workqueue-fixes drivers/net/smc911x.c
--- a/drivers/net/smc911x.c~smc911-workqueue-fixes
+++ a/drivers/net/smc911x.c
@@ -148,6 +148,8 @@ struct smc911x_local {
int tx_throttle;
spinlock_t lock;
+ struct net_device *netdev;
+
#ifdef SMC_USE_DMA
/* DMA needs the physical address of the chip */
u_long physaddr;
@@ -948,10 +950,11 @@ static void smc911x_phy_check_media(stru
* of autonegotiation.) If the RPC ANEG bit is cleared, the selection
* is controlled by the RPC SPEED and RPC DPLX bits.
*/
-static void smc911x_phy_configure(void *data)
+static void smc911x_phy_configure(struct work_struct *work)
{
- struct net_device *dev = data;
- struct smc911x_local *lp = netdev_priv(dev);
+ struct smc911x_local *lp = container_of(work, struct smc911x_local,
+ phy_configure);
+ struct net_device *dev = lp->netdev;
unsigned long ioaddr = dev->base_addr;
int phyaddr = lp->mii.phy_id;
int my_phy_caps; /* My PHY capabilities */
@@ -1495,6 +1498,8 @@ static void smc911x_set_multicast_list(s
static int
smc911x_open(struct net_device *dev)
{
+ struct smc911x_local *lp = netdev_priv(dev);
+
DBG(SMC_DEBUG_FUNC, "%s: --> %s\n", dev->name, __FUNCTION__);
/*
@@ -1511,7 +1516,7 @@ smc911x_open(struct net_device *dev)
smc911x_reset(dev);
/* Configure the PHY, initialize the link state */
- smc911x_phy_configure(dev);
+ smc911x_phy_configure(&lp->phy_configure);
/* Turn on Tx + Rx */
smc911x_enable(dev);
@@ -2060,7 +2065,7 @@ static int __init smc911x_probe(struct n
dev->poll_controller = smc911x_poll_controller;
#endif
- INIT_WORK(&lp->phy_configure, smc911x_phy_configure, dev);
+ INIT_WORK(&lp->phy_configure, smc911x_phy_configure);
lp->mii.phy_id_mask = 0x1f;
lp->mii.reg_num_mask = 0x1f;
lp->mii.force_media = 0;
@@ -2154,6 +2159,7 @@ static int smc911x_drv_probe(struct plat
{
struct net_device *ndev;
struct resource *res;
+ struct smc911x_local *lp;
unsigned int *addr;
int ret;
@@ -2183,6 +2189,8 @@ static int smc911x_drv_probe(struct plat
ndev->dma = (unsigned char)-1;
ndev->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+ lp = netdev_priv(ndev);
+ lp->netdev = ndev;
addr = ioremap(res->start, SMC911X_IO_EXTENT);
if (!addr) {
@@ -2204,7 +2212,6 @@ out:
}
#ifdef SMC_USE_DMA
else {
- struct smc911x_local *lp = netdev_priv(ndev);
lp->physaddr = res->start;
lp->dev = &pdev->dev;
}
@@ -2275,7 +2282,7 @@ static int smc911x_drv_resume(struct pla
smc911x_reset(ndev);
smc911x_enable(ndev);
if (lp->phy_type != 0)
- smc911x_phy_configure(ndev);
+ smc911x_phy_configure(&lp->phy_configure);
netif_device_attach(ndev);
}
}
_
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists