netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/2] A bugfix patchset for NetLabel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <XMMS.LNX.4.64.0612151840370.26929@d.namei>
Date:	Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:19:56 -0500 (EST)
From:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:	paul.moore@...com
cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] A bugfix patchset for NetLabel

On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, paul.moore@...com wrote:

> This patch set fixes two bugs that were found recently when adding new CIPSOv4
> DOI definitions.  These patches are pretty small and have been tested by a few
> different people on several different platforms.

Applied to git://git.infradead.org/~jmorris/selinux-2.6#fixes

> Please apply these for 2.6.20 and they should probably be pushed to the 2.6.19
> stable tree as well; is there anything special I need to do for that?

I'm not sure that they qualify.

The first is a privileged operation, right?

For the second, what are the implications of mapping to zero?


Also review Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt.





-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html