[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061218152111.868f9284.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:21:11 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: benjamin.li@...gic.com
Cc: "bugme-daemon@...nel-bugs.osdl.org"
<bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7708] New: unregister_netdev() should return
unregister_netdevice() return code
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:56:31 -0800
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7708
>
> Summary: unregister_netdev() should return unregister_netdevice()
> return code
> Kernel Version: 2.6.19.1
> Status: NEW
> Severity: low
> Owner: acme@...ectiva.com.br
> Submitter: benjamin.li@...gic.com
>
>
> net/core/dev.c:unregister_netdev() function is a wrapper around
> net/core/dev.c:unregister_netdevice(). The unregister_netdevice() function
> returns a return code while unregister_netdev() currently does not. For
> completeness, we should pass the return code from unregister_netdevice() all the
> way to the caller. unregister_netdev() should not swallow the return code.
>
Certainly there's some truth in that ;)
Is there some reason why you want to test the unregister_netdev() return
value?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists