lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612201213530.22453@netcore.fi>
Date:	Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:22:56 +0200 (EET)
From:	Pekka Savola <pekkas@...core.fi>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: ND unsolicited NAs when address is added?

Hi,

RFC2461 specifies in section 7.2.6 that a host may send unsolicited 
NA(s) for example when its link layer address changes or IP address is 
added to inform the neighbors that their ND cache may need to be 
updated.

Some current routers (probably) erroneously depend on this to reduce 
the "downtime" if an IP address is moved from one host to another 
(otherwise they'll continue to forward packets to the old link-layer 
address until their ND cache timeouts).

I tested this behaviour on Linux 2.6.18 and FreeBSD 6.2 and neither 
sends these unsolicited NAs when an IP address is configured.  Is 
there a reason not to add this optimization?

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ