netdev - Re: Network drivers that don't suspend on interface down

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200612202057.09545.flamingice@sourmilk.net>
Date:	Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:57:05 -0500
From:	Michael Wu <flamingice@...rmilk.net>
To:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc:	Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>, Jiri Benc <jbenc@...e.cz>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Network drivers that don't suspend on interface down

On Wednesday 20 December 2006 20:15, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Because it works on the common hardware? If there's documentation about
> what userspace can legitimately expect, then I'm happy to defer to that.
> But in the absence of any indication as to what functionality users can
> depend on, deciding that existing functionality is a bug is, well,
> impolite.
>
No, it's absolutely a bug. It just so happens that some drivers incorrectly 
allowed it.

-Michael Wu

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped