netdev - Re: [PATCH] igmp: spin_lock_bh in timer (Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Dec 2006 08:16:10 -0800
From:	Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] igmp: spin_lock_bh in timer (Re: BUG: soft lockup detected
 on CPU#0!)

Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 06:05:18AM -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
>> Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 08:13:08AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>>>> On 20-12-2006 03:13, Ben Greear wrote:
>>>>> This is from 2.6.18.2 kernel with my patch set.  The MAC-VLANs are in 
>>>>> active use.
>>>>> From the backtrace, I am thinking this might be a generic problem, 
>>>>> however.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any ideas about what this could be?  It seems to be reproducible every 
>>>>> day or
>>> ...
>>>> If it doesn't help, I hope lockdep will be more
>>>> precise when you'll upgrade to 2.6.19 or higher.
>>> ... or when you enable lockdep in 2.6.18 (I've
>>> forgotten it's there alredy!).
>> I got lucky..the system was available by ssh still.  I see this in the boot 
>> logs..I assume
>> this means lockdep is enabled?  Should I have expected to see a lockdep 
>> trace in the case of
>> his soft-lockup then?
>>
>> .....
>> Dec 19 04:33:48 localhost kernel: Lock dependency validator: Copyright (c) 
>> 2006 Red Hat, Inc., Ingo MolnarDec 19 04:33:48 localhost kernel: ... 
>> MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES:    8
> 
> Yes, you got it enabled in the config.
> 
> If there is no message later about validator
> turning off and no warnings which could point
> at lockdep then it is working.
> 
> But then, IMHO, there is rather small probability
> this bug is really from lockup. Another possibility
> is hardware irqs (timer in particular) are turned
> off by something (maybe those hacks?) for extremely
> long time (~10 sec.). 

The system hangs and does not recover (well, a few processes
continue on the other processor for a few minutes before they
too deadlock...)

I am guessing this problem has been around for a while, but it
is only triggered when interfaces are created, and probably only
when UDP traffic is already running heavily on the system.  Most
systems w/out virtual devices will not trigger this sort of
race.

Ben

>  
> Regards,
> Jarek P.


-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html