netdev - Re: [patch sungem] improved locking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 29 Dec 2006 15:20:53 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	benh@...nel.crashing.org
Cc:	eric.lemoine@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch sungem] improved locking

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 08:36:07 +1100

> Heh, it's very possible it's a regression I added indeed. I'll try to
> have a look next week. Do you know of anybody who can verify on non-mii
> hardware or is pause irrelevant there ?

For PCS based PHY's most of the logic is taken care of internally,
and the pause-present signal is just sampled from one of the
PCS registers.

I think I have one here using non-mii that I could check at
some point :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html