[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <459A9D24.8000807@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 09:57:56 -0800
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: hadi@...erus.ca, Robert Iakobashvili <coroberti@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Network card IRQ balancing with Intel 5000 series chipsets
>>With NAPI, if i have a few interupts it likely implies i have a huge
>>network load (and therefore CPU use) and would be much more happier if
>>you didnt start moving more interupt load to that already loaded CPU....
>
>
> current irqbalance accounts for napi by using the number of packets as
> indicator for load, not the number of interrupts. (for network
> interrupts obviously)
And hopefully some knowledge of NUMA so it doesn't "balance" the
interrupts of a NIC to some far-off (topology-wise) CPU...
rick jones
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists