netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1] bonding: eliminate RTNL assertion spew

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:13:55 -0500
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
CC:	fubar@...ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] bonding: eliminate RTNL assertion spew

Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> -void bond_alb_handle_active_change(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *new_slave)
> +void bond_alb_handle_active_change(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *new_slave, int rtnl_locked)
>  {
>  	struct slave *swap_slave;
>  	int i;

Although this is not a direct NAK (haven't read the full patch yet), 
conditional locking behavior like this is /very/ fragile, and in Linux 
is generally discouraged.  Vendor drivers in particular have a history 
of constantly getting this wrong, and it makes locking more difficult to 
review.

	Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html