netdev - Re: kernel BUG in eth_alloc_tx_desc_index at drivers/net/mv643xx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070109130220.GA4060@ff.dom.local>
Date:	Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:02:20 +0100
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
To:	Thibaut VARENE <T-Bone@...isc-linux.org>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel BUG in eth_alloc_tx_desc_index at drivers/net/mv643xx_eth.c:1069!

On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 11:27:59AM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
...
> I suspected both and changed both the disk and the ram for quality
> parts, that I tested afterwards. Both passed thorough tests.
> 
> Finally, using the other NIC on the box (a VIA Rhine II, 100Mbps),
> works absolutely fine.

If you are not tired, I'd suggest two more tests:

- as above but with NIC set to 100Mbps also,

- long downloading but without nfs e.g. ftp
(btw. there were some patches after 2.6.19
for rpc memory races).

Jarek P.

PS: Maintainers were cc-ed, I hope?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html