netdev - Re: [PATCH/RFC 01/10] Implement local diversion of IPv4 skbs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200701111505.07035@nienna>
Date:	Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:05:05 +0100
From:	KOVACS Krisztian <hidden@...abit.hu>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc:	Balazs Scheidler <bazsi@...abit.hu>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@...ts.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 01/10] Implement local diversion of IPv4 skbs


  Hi,

On Wednesday 10 January 2007 13:32, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> How exactly are dynamic ports handled? Do you just add a catch-all rule
> that filters based on socket lookups?
>
> In that case you could do something like this:
>
> ip route add local default dev lo scope host table 1
> ip rule add fwmark 0x1 lookup 1
>
> and still use the socket lookups for marking, which would (without the
> socket caching) remove the need for this patch entirely.

  Ok, I'll try to address all the concerns raised on the list.

  Thanks a lot for the review and comments.

-- 
 Regards,
  Krisztian Kovacs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html