[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070115101742.GB1644@ff.dom.local>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:17:42 +0100
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [IPROUTE 04/05]: Replace "usec" by "time" in function names
On 10-01-2007 11:01, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> [IPROUTE]: Replace "usec" by "time" in function names
>
> Rename functions containing "usec" since they don't necessarily return
> usec units anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
>
> ---
...
> diff --git a/tc/q_cbq.c b/tc/q_cbq.c
> index 0000a56..913b26a 100644
> --- a/tc/q_cbq.c
> +++ b/tc/q_cbq.c
> @@ -500,17 +500,17 @@ static int cbq_print_opt(struct qdisc_ut
> if (lss && show_details) {
> fprintf(f, "\nlevel %u ewma %u avpkt %ub ", lss->level, lss->ewma_log, lss->avpkt);
> if (lss->maxidle) {
> - fprintf(f, "maxidle %luus ", tc_core_tick2usec(lss->maxidle>>lss->ewma_log));
> + fprintf(f, "maxidle %luus ", tc_core_tick2time(lss->maxidle>>lss->ewma_log));
If not necessarily usec, "%luus" could be misleading
here and later.
...
> diff --git a/tc/q_netem.c b/tc/q_netem.c
> index cfd1799..24fb95e 100644
> --- a/tc/q_netem.c
> +++ b/tc/q_netem.c
> @@ -108,15 +108,15 @@ static int get_ticks(__u32 *ticks, const
> {
> unsigned t;
>
> - if(get_usecs(&t, str))
> + if(get_time(&t, str))
> return -1;
>
> - if (tc_core_usec2big(t)) {
> + if (tc_core_time2big(t)) {
> fprintf(stderr, "Illegal %d usecs (too large)\n", t);
Like above but usecs.
...
> diff --git a/tc/tc_core.c b/tc/tc_core.c
> index 07dc4ba..e27254e 100644
> --- a/tc/tc_core.c
> +++ b/tc/tc_core.c
> @@ -27,21 +27,21 @@ static __u32 t2us=1;
> static __u32 us2t=1;
> static double tick_in_usec = 1;
>
> -int tc_core_usec2big(long usec)
> +int tc_core_time2big(long time)
> {
> - __u64 t = usec;
> + __u64 t = time;
>
> t *= tick_in_usec;
> return (t >> 32) != 0;
> }
>
>
> -long tc_core_usec2tick(long usec)
> +long tc_core_time2tick(long time)
> {
> - return usec*tick_in_usec;
> + return time*tick_in_usec;
> }
>
> -long tc_core_tick2usec(long tick)
> +long tc_core_tick2time(long tick)
> {
> return tick/tick_in_usec;
> }
Similarly (tick_in_time)?
Regards,
Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists