netdev - RE: intel 82571EB gigabit fails to see link on 2.6.20-rc5 in-tree e1000 driver (regression)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <36D9DB17C6DE9E40B059440DB8D95F5201A78A3B@orsmsx418.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:02:49 -0800
From:	"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
To:	"Jesse Brandeburg" <jesse.brandeburg@...il.com>,
	"Allen Parker" <parker@...hunt.com>
Cc:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>,
	<linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Subject: RE: intel 82571EB gigabit fails to see link on 2.6.20-rc5 in-tree e1000 driver (regression)

added Linux-pci

Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> On 1/16/07, Allen Parker <parker@...hunt.com> wrote:
>> Allen Parker wrote:
>>> I have a PCI-E pro/1000 MT Quad Port adapter, which works quite well
>>> under 2.6.19.2 but fails to see link under 2.6.20-rc5. Earlier
>>> today I reported this to e1000-devel@...ts.sf.net, but thought I
>>> should get the word out in case someone else is testing this kernel
>>> on this nic chipset. 
> 
> Upon some further investigation with Allen, I got this info, and it
> appears that his system is not freeing MSI irq's correctly.
> 
> from our discussion:
>> Allen wrote:
>>> Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
>>> I believe you may have an interrupt delivery problem, due to kernel
>>> changes.  When you don't get interrupts delivered correctly, you may
>>> not achieve link up.
>>> 
>>> you can try disabling CONFIG_PCI_MSI in the kernel, as another
>>> trouble shooting step.  Also, what model motherboard/machine are you
>>> using, and please check to make sure your BIOS is up to date.
>> 
>> CONFIG_PCI_MSI seems to fix it as well, however, i'm not sure about
>> possible performance implications with leaving it turned off.
>> 
>> Tyan S2927G2NR w/ 2x Opteron 2210 bios rev 1.02 iirc
> 
> Also, here is an excerpt of his his proc/interrupts
> Allen Parker wrote:
>        CPU0       CPU1       CPU2       CPU3
> 498:      1          8        129       8723   PCI-MSI-edge      eth3
> 499:      0         42        122      17135   PCI-MSI-edge      eth2
> 500:      0         19        275    1418326   PCI-MSI-edge      eth1
> 501:      0          0          0          0   PCI-MSI-edge      eth1
> 502:      0        414         26      25227   PCI-MSI-edge      eth1
> 503:      0         37        264    1418695   PCI-MSI-edge      eth0
> 504:      0          0          0        139   PCI-MSI-edge      eth0
> 505:      0          6        714      22806   PCI-MSI-edge      eth0
> NMI:    275        207        225        262
> LOC:3531851    3531829    3531805    3531778
> ERR:      0
> 
> The disturbing bit is that on this Hypertransport to PCIe system, his
> interrupts appear to be getting registered multiple times on different
> IRQ numbers.
> 
> help?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html