[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070117081420.GA1613@ff.dom.local>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:14:20 +0100
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
To: Bernhard Schmidt <berni@...kenwald.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [IPv6] PROBLEM? Network unreachable despite correct route
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:08:16PM +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>
> >>ip -6 route:
> >>2001:4ca0:0:f000::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 expires
> >>86322sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 fragtimeout 4294967295
> >>fe80::/64 dev eth0 metric 256 expires 21225804sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440
> >>fragtimeout 4294967295
> >>ff00::/8 dev eth0 metric 256 expires 21225804sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440
> >>fragtimeout 4294967295
> >>default via fe80::2d0:4ff:fe12:2400 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 1024
> >>expires 1717sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 fragtimeout 64
> >>unreachable default dev lo proto none metric -1 error -101 fragtimeout
> >>255
I've a look at this once more and have one more doubt:
probably it's some other ip6 trick again, but why this
default router doesn't have "normal" address in the
same segment (2001:4ca0:.../64)?
Regards,
Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists