netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/8] partial resend: e1000 fixes and updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45AFA6A4.4090503@pobox.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:56:04 -0500
From:	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
To:	"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
	"Kok, Auke" <auke@...-projects.org>,
	"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] partial resend: e1000 fixes and updates

Kok, Auke wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This patch series contains exclusively fixes for e1000. Some of these patches were
> already sent in december, but didn't make it into any usptream tree yet. Most
> importantly, it addresses two issues in the recently merged msi interrupt
> handler and dynamic itr code. A performance fix and some minor cleanups are also
> added. This brings the driver up to version 7.3.20-k2.
> 
> The summary below lists all patches. Once that were previously acked are annotated
> with (*)
> 
> These patches apply against netdev-2.6 #upstream-linus commit
> 77aab8bf22042d1658d4adbca8b71779e7f2d0ff. Please pull:
> 
> git pull git://lost.foo-projects.org/~ahkok/git/netdev-2.6 upstream-linus

Sigh.  I /know/ I've told you this before, but let's review the branches 
again.  NEVER EVER use branch 'upstream-linus'.  That is for Linus only.

There are three branches you should care about:

master			Vanilla upstream Linus tree, as of my last pull
upstream-fixes		netdev fixes being sent to Linus for -rc
upstream		Everything else pending, but not yet merged

The decision tree is as follows:

* If there are no dependent e1000 changes, send patches against master 
(or torvalds/linux-2.6.git, if you prefer)
* If there are dependent e1000 changes in #upstream-fixes, send patches 
against #upstream-fixes
* If there are dependent e1000 changes in #upstream, send patches 
against #upstream

In the current tree there are no e1000 changes, so please regenerate 
your tree against vanilla linux-2.6.git and resubmit.

I ACK patches 1-8.

	Jeff




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html