netdev - Re: intel 82571EB gigabit fails to see link on 2.6.20-rc5 in-tree e1000 driver (regression)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <011101c73c29$9f6f5db0$84163e05@kroptech.com>
Date:	Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:26:26 -0500
From:	"Adam Kropelin" <akropel1@...hester.rr.com>
To:	"Auke Kok" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
Cc:	"Allen Parker" <parker@...hunt.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: intel 82571EB gigabit fails to see link on 2.6.20-rc5 in-tree e1000 driver (regression)

Auke Kok wrote:
> Adam Kropelin wrote:
>> I haven't been able to test rc5-mm yet because it won't boot on this
>> box. Applying git-e1000 directly to -rc4 or -rc5 results in a number
>> of rejects that I'm not sure how to fix. Some are obvious, but the
>> others I'm unsure of.
>
> that won't work. You either need to start with 2.6.20-rc5 (and pull
> the changes pending merge in netdev-2.6 from Jeff Garzik),

I thought that's what I was doing when I applied git-e1000 to 
2.6.20-rc5, but I guess not.

> or start
> with 2.6.20-rc4-mm1 and manually apply that patch I sent out on
> monday. A different combination of either of these two will not work,
> as they are completely different drivers.

I'll try to work something out.

> can you include `ethtool ethX` output of the link down message and
> `ethtool -d ethX` as well? I'll need to dig up an 82572 and see
> what's up with that, I've not seen that problem before.

ethtool output attached.

> More importantly, I suspect that *again* the issue is caused by
> interrupts not arriving or getting lost.

Smells that way to me, too.

> Can you try running with MSI disabled in your kernel config?

That fixes it! The link comes up and tx/rx works well. I get about 300 
Mbps using default iperf settings with a nearby windows box.

> FYI the driver gives an interrupt to signal to the driver that link
> is up. no interrupt == no link detected. So that explains the symptom.

Yep, makes sense. I've worked with a number of PHYs like that.

--Adam

Download attachment "ethtool-eth1" of type "application/octet-stream" (622 bytes)

Download attachment "ethtool-d-eth1" of type "application/octet-stream" (2392 bytes)