[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070122200004.GA12553@dreamland.darkstar.lan>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:00:04 +0100
From: Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@...il.com>
To: Jay Cliburn <jacliburn@...lsouth.net>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>, jeff@...zik.org,
shemminger@...l.org, csnook@...hat.com, hch@...radead.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
atl1-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, kronos.it@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] atl1: Ancillary C files for Attansic L1 driver
Il Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:33:39PM -0600, Jay Cliburn ha scritto:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 15:07:37 -0600 Jay Cliburn wrote:
> [snip]
>
> >>+ value = ioread16(hw->hw_addr + REG_PCIE_CAP_LIST);
> >>+ return ((value & 0xFF00) == 0x6C00) ? 0 : 1;
> >
> >Are there defines or enums for these?
> >Fewer magic numbers would be nice/helpful/readable.
> [snip]
> >>+ s32 ret;
> >>+ ret = atl1_write_phy_reg(hw, 29, 0x0029);
> >
> >Fewer magic numbers?
>
> Unfortunately, we don't have a spec. This is how the vendor coded it.
>
> [snip]
> >>+
> >>+int enable_msi;
> >>+module_param(enable_msi, int, 0444);
> >>+MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable_msi, "Enable PCI MSI");
> >
> >Hm, I thought that we didn't want individual drivers having MSI config
> >options...
>
> Luca? This one was yours IIRC. Care to chime in?
I remember that discussion, but since there's no sistem-wide MSI
blacklist (or whitelist) I don't think it's safe to enable it
unconditionally. Judging from bug reports on lkml it's not safe to
assume that MSI support is sane on non-Intel chipsets.
Luca
--
Il coraggio non mi manca.
E` la paura che mi frega...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists