[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070124102044.GG17836@stusta.de>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 11:20:44 +0100
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] process include/linux/if_{addr,link}.h with unifdef
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 10:05:17PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
> Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:13:19 +0100
>
> > After commit d3dcc077bf88806201093f86325ec656e4dbfbce,
> > include/linux/if_{addr,link}.h should be processed with unifdef.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
>
> Applied, thanks Adrian.
>
> I believe at least the 2.6.19 -stable branch will need
> this too, right? Please submit to -stable as needed,
> and feel free to add my sign-off:
>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
All my patch does is to remove "#ifndef __KERNEL__"'s around userspace
#define's from the userspace headers, so it's purely cosmetical.
Except when userspace wrongly defines __KERNEL__, no
header-y<->unifdef-y should ever have any non-cosmetical effect.
That said, we really want what I called "cosmetical" - not having
"#if{,n}def __KERNEL__" in any userspace headers - it's simply that this
is not a serious bug.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists