[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070124152638.GC3036@dmt.poa.virtua.com.br>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:26:38 -0200
From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@...ck.org>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Jiri Benc <jbenc@...e.cz>, Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@...ck.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...hat.com>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Marvell Libertas 8388 802.11b/g USB driver (v2)
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 03:22:50AM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 06:19:07PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > >On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 01:00:47PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> > >>allows the 8388 to continue routing other laptops' packets over the mesh
> > >>*while the host CPU is asleep*.
> > >
> > >We're not going to put a lot of junk into the kernel just because the OLPC
> > >folks decide to do odd powermanagment schemes.
> >
> > We're not going to ignore useful power management schemes just because
> > they don't fit neatly into a pre-existing category.
> >
> > I think the request to determine how all this maps into MLME is fair,
> > though.
>
> Definitely. Also, I wonder if there was any attempt to evaluate how
> the ieee80211 (or d80211) code might be extended in order to elimnate
> the need for some of the libertas wlan_* files?
The regulatory domain structures, channel information (struct
ieee80211_channel), HW mode (struct ieee80211_hw_mode) compromised of
supported channels and rates, and probably a few others in the same
category. I can't see the possibility of using d80211 as it stands
(designed for softmac cards dealing with 802.11 packets to/from the OS).
However, it does not make any sense to use the structures defined by
d80211 if not effectively using it (we send/receive 802.3 frames to the
firmware, after all), IMO.
As discussed on this thread, there is a lot of code to be cleanup up,
but no structural changes AFAICT. Is there a general agreement on that,
now?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists