lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:53:38 -0800 (PST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: kuznet@....inr.ac.ru Cc: raivis@...lv, netdev@...r.kernel.org, waltje@...lt.NL.Mugnet.ORG, gw4pts@...pts.ampr.org, dim@...nvz.org Subject: Re: [BUG] problem with BPF in PF_PACKET sockets, introduced in linux-2.6.19 From: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:22:20 +0300 > Actually, it can. Return value was used only as sign of error, > so that the mistake was to return original unsigned result casted to int. > > Alternative fix is enclosed. To be honest, it is not better than > yours: duplication of couple lines of code against passing return > value by pointer. Yes, this version of a fix would work as well. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists