netdev - RE: bonding: bug in balance-alb mode (incorrect update-ARP-replie s)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <FA8270F9F8D35946ADDBC0F36E6667CE0175C9BE@nts27.saarstahl.de>
Date:	Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:41:32 +0100
From:	"JUNG, Christian" <christian.jung@...rstahl.com>
To:	'Jay Vosburgh' <fubar@...ibm.com>
Cc:	"'netdev@...r.kernel.org'" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: bonding: bug in balance-alb mode (incorrect update-ARP-replie
	s) 

> Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> 	Is your test occuring on an isolated network, and is there other
> concurrent network traffic that might be affecting things?

The problem still persists as long as the box is connected to our Ciscos.

I tried to simulate it with a dumb switch with my two boxes connected only.
But there were no unsolicited ARP-replies anymore.

On the Ciscos I sometimes see ARP-replies with a destination MAC of
00:00:00:00:00:00 (!) from some Linux-boxes which are using bonding.
Currently I don't have a clue from where they're coming...

The boxes are receiving around 200 ARP-replies a minute - so yes, there's
concurrent network traffic :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html