netdev - [PATCH] Fix sorting of SACK blocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070125182903.GA22455@galon.ev-en.org>
Date:	Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:29:03 +0200
From:	Baruch Even <baruch@...en.org>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Fix sorting of SACK blocks

The sorting of SACK blocks actually munges them rather than sort, causing the
TCP stack to ignore some SACK information and breaking the assumption of
ordered SACK blocks after sorting.

The sort takes the data from a second buffer which isn't moved causing
subsequent data moves to occur from the wrong location. The fix is to
use a temporary buffer as a normal sort does.

Signed-Off-By: Baruch Even <baruch@...en.org>

diff -X 2.6-rc6/Documentation/dontdiff -ur 2.6-rc6/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c 2.6-mod/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
--- 2.6-rc6/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c	2007-01-25 19:04:20.000000000 +0200
+++ 2.6-mod/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c	2007-01-25 19:52:04.000000000 +0200
@@ -1011,10 +1011,11 @@
 			for (j = 0; j < i; j++){
 				if (after(ntohl(sp[j].start_seq),
 					  ntohl(sp[j+1].start_seq))){
-					sp[j].start_seq = htonl(tp->recv_sack_cache[j+1].start_seq);
-					sp[j].end_seq = htonl(tp->recv_sack_cache[j+1].end_seq);
-					sp[j+1].start_seq = htonl(tp->recv_sack_cache[j].start_seq);
-					sp[j+1].end_seq = htonl(tp->recv_sack_cache[j].end_seq);
+					struct tcp_sack_block_wire tmp;
+
+					tmp = sp[j];
+					sp[j] = sp[j+1];
+					sp[j+1] = tmp;
 				}
 
 			}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html