netdev - Re: [PATCH] TCP: Replace __kfree_skb() with kfree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070126104518.GA24490@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:	Fri, 26 Jan 2007 21:45:18 +1100
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
Cc:	Masayuki Nakagawa <nakagawa.msy@...s.nec.co.jp>,
	davem@...emloft.net, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, mhuth@...sta.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TCP: Replace __kfree_skb() with kfree_skb()

On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 11:18:38AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> 
> I don't mean it's necessary. I mean now skb is freed
> unconditionally and after this patch, if there is some
> error in counting, skb will stay. I thought Masayuki
> wrote about such possibility, but if I missed his
> point, then the rest is really O.K.

OK, I see what you mean.

I'm not aware of anybody who has coded in this way.  Alexey & Dave,
do you know of any place where __kfree_skb is used to free an skb
whose ref count is greater than 1?

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html