netdev - Re: net-2.6.21 GIT tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070129072552.GM22455@galon.ev-en.org>
Date:	Mon, 29 Jan 2007 09:25:52 +0200
From:	Baruch Even <baruch@...en.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: net-2.6.21 GIT tree

* David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> [070129 02:54]:
> 
> I just cut it at:
> 
> 	kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.21.git
> 
> Feel free to send me feature patches for consideration.
> 
> I'll probably toss things like Baruch's latest SACK fixes in
> there so they can cook for a while and then perhaps after some
> time we'll backport them into whatever -stable branch is active
> at the time.

The new fixes are much less important than the first one so I have no
problem with them waiting a bit. I do think that only actively testing
the SACK processing correctness and performance will show anything. It's
been shown time and again that most peoples just take the existing
behaviour as ok even if it is inefficient at best.

I'll try to get access to a network testbed or setup a virtual one on my
laptop and actually test this code.

Baruch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html