[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070131130447.GF19643@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:04:47 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...ia.com>
Cc: ext Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org,
ipw2100-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] Runtime power management on ipw2100
On Wed 2007-01-31 13:53:20, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 11:48 +0100, ext Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Wednesday 31 January 2007 11:27, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 12:13:04PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > PCI seems to require a delay of 10ms when sequencing from D3 to D0,
> > > > > which probably isn't acceptable latency for an "up" state.
> > > >
> > > > It might be if the interface has been idle for some time
> > > > (and the delay is not busy looping of course)
> > >
> > > Hm. How would this interact with receiving packets?
> >
> > The hardware will hopefully have support to wake itself up when that
> > happens.
>
> Yes. Low power states without ability to respond to wakeup interrupts
> would be broken behaviour generally.
Do you realy expect wifi to save significant ammount of power, while
still listening for packets on wireless network?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists