[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1170249876.6746.43.camel@amit-laptop>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:24:36 +0200
From: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...ia.com>
To: ext Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
Cc: ext Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org,
ipw2100-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] Runtime power management on ipw2100
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 14:04 +0100, ext Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2007-01-31 13:53:20, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> >
> > Yes. Low power states without ability to respond to wakeup interrupts
> > would be broken behaviour generally.
>
> Do you realy expect wifi to save significant ammount of power, while
> still listening for packets on wireless network?
> Pavel
>>From N800 specs (not meant as a shameless plug):
Continuous WLAN browsing: upto 3.5 hrs
Always Online WLAN (idle but respond to VoIP calls): upto 2 days
Standby time(no WLAN): upto 12 days
So with the right hardware, yes, you can listen and still save power.
Regards,
Amit
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists