netdev - Re: [RFC][PATCH][XFRM][4/5] extension to XFRM for dynamic endpoint update (MIGRATE)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702010947530.8524@d.namei>
Date:	Thu, 1 Feb 2007 09:50:00 -0500 (EST)
From:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:	Shinta Sugimoto <shinta@....wide.ad.jp>
cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@...nt6.net>,
	Masahide Nakamura <nakam@...ux-ipv6.org>,
	usagi-core@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH][XFRM][4/5] extension to XFRM for dynamic endpoint
 update (MIGRATE)

On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Shinta Sugimoto wrote:

> +	/* allow IPSEC_PROTO_ANY to match all protocols */
> +	//sel.proto = pfkey_proto_to_xfrm(sa->sadb_address_proto);
> +	sel.proto = sa->sadb_address_proto;

Which one is correct ? :-)

> +	/* allow IPSEC_PROTO_ANY to match all protocols */
> +	//sel.proto = pfkey_proto_to_xfrm(sa->sadb_address_proto);
> +	sel.proto = sa->sadb_address_proto;

...



- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html