netdev - Re: "meaningful" spinlock contention when bound to non-intr CPU?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45C24389.80800@hp.com>
Date:	Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:46:17 -0800
From:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To:	Linux Network Development list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: "meaningful" spinlock contention when bound to non-intr CPU?

Rick Jones wrote:
> A 2.6.10-rc5 kernel onto each system thanks to pointers from Dan Frazier.

gaak - 2.6.20-rc5 that is.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html