[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1170632672.2620.47.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 10:44:32 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Jens Osterkamp <jens@...ibm.com>
Cc: Ishizaki Kou <kou.ishizaki@...hiba.co.jp>, jim@...ewis.com,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, jgarzik@...ox.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] spidernet: dynamic phy setup code
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 12:04 +0100, Jens Osterkamp wrote:
> Ishizaki-san,
>
> > This patch partially works on celleb but remains
> > following several problems.
> > 1. It doesn't recover once an ethernet cable which is
> > connected to a spider_net card is unpluged.
>
> My understanding is that you are using the LINK interrupt to detect this.
> For the blade this is not connected but reenabling it wont hurt, I hope.
I would suggest just polling from a delayed work or a timer like sungem
does.
> I still dont see why you need different settings for different speed switches.
> This is getting to a point where access to some hardware would be handy.
> What exact phy are using anyway ?
Yeah, same question...
> > Furthermore, we have a problem that poll_link() may succeed even when
> > the auto-neg initial setting is for different network switch type,
> > and the network card does not work on this case. We retry auto-neg
> > with the another initial setting on this case.
>
> See above, could you give some more details why this is the case. Or maybe Ben
> knows more about this ?
No, I'm surprised too.
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists