netdev - [PATCH 0/3] NetXen: 1G/10G Ethernet Driver updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200702051531.l15FVHr9008504@dut39.unminc.com>
Date:	Mon, 5 Feb 2007 07:31:17 -0800
From:	"Amit S. Kale" <amitkale@...xen.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	amitkale@...xen.com, jeff@...zik.org, netxenproj@...syssoft.com,
	rob@...xen.com, sanjeev@...xen.com, wendyx@...ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] NetXen: 1G/10G Ethernet Driver updates

Hi All,

I will be sending NetXen: 1G/10G Ethernet Driver updates with respect to 
netdev #master in the subsequent emails.

We have incorporated the feedbacks we got for the patch on the ethtool 
support for user level tools, except for these:

Jeff Garzik wrote:
>is it ok to return without re-locking flash?

After flashing, we have to reboot the machine before we can use
the newer flash. So re-locking is not necessary.
Also its not possible to detect the end of flashing process, so as 
to lock the flash after that.

>>       netxen_nic_reg_write(adapter, NETXEN_ROMUSB_ROM_ABYTE_CNT, 0);
>> -     udelay(100);            /* prevent bursting on CRB */
>> +     udelay(70);             /* prevent bursting on CRB */
Jeff Garzik wrote:
>why?

This is only to reduce the flashing time.

Thanks,
--Amit
~

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html