netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] d80211: Add software RTS support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 5 Feb 2007 19:23:50 +0100
From:	Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
To:	Jiri Benc <jbenc@...e.cz>
Cc:	Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@...il.com>,
	"John Linville" <linville@...driver.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Michael Buesch <mbuesch@...enet.de>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] d80211: Add software RTS support

On Monday 05 February 2007 19:08, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 18:43:06 +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > I also think that sending RTS in software is not going to work,
> > as the timing can not be guaranteed. And timing is why we do it in
> > the first place. If the HW is not capable of sending RTS frames, we
> > should not try to emulate them in SW, as it might make the situation
> > even worse by messing up the NAVs by wrong timing.
> 
> That's not emulation in the software, it's just similar approach as
> with sending fragmented frames - you need (more or less) precise timing
> there as well and many cards still want them enqueued one-by-one. The
> firmware takes care of the precise timing. The same could apply to RTS
> frames (i. e. the firmware recognize them and doesn't send them before
> it has the next frame ready).

Yeah, ok. I got the point.
But still, this does not work with bcm43xx. :)

-- 
Greetings Michael.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html