netdev - Re: Funny Routing change since 2.6.16.x

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45CB5098.3020107@trash.net>
Date:	Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:32:24 +0100
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Ingo Oeser <netdev@...eo.de>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Funny Routing change since 2.6.16.x

Ingo Oeser wrote:
> Patrick McHardy schrieb:
> 
>>Since these packets already have the proper source address chosen
>>by routing, there is no need to NAT them anymore. So the easiest
>>fix is to exclude them manually from masquerading based on the
>>address.
> 
> 
> Just did that (iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING -s $SRCADDR -o ppp0 -j ACCEPT)
> and it works without any problems.
> 
> Many thanks for your very fast help! I'm very happy now :-)
> 
> Do you know any good place, where this can be documented?


We have a netfilter Wiki now at wiki.netfilter.org. You could add
the first entry :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html