[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070209.011542.21927454.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 01:15:42 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dada1@...mosbay.com
Cc: ak@...e.de, linux@...izon.com, akepner@....com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NET : change layout of ehash table
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 10:06:24 +0100
> Yes, but a decent C compiler for such targets should not use a
> multiply instruction to perform a (idx * 12) operation... :)
Good point.
Actually, I could never get GCC to avoid a divide on sparc64 for
certain kinds of pointer arithmetic when the elements were not
a power of two. It probably has something to do with signedness.
I think I narrowed is down to the fact that you can't legally replace
a signed divide with shift/add/subtract. But I could be remembering
things wrong.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists