[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200702092026.43006.mb@bu3sch.de>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 20:26:42 +0100
From: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
To: Joseph Jezak <josejx@...too.org>
Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
John Linville <linville@...driver.com>,
Bcm43xx-dev@...ts.berlios.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix code for spec changes of 2/7/2007
On Friday 09 February 2007 20:17, Joseph Jezak wrote:
> >
> > The specs are unclear at this point:
> > "Write the value to the offset"
> > Offset in which register type?
>
> PHY Register. I've clarified it in the specs, I think this was said
> before, I made it worse when I cleaned it up.
>
> >> // Initialization
> >> - if (phy->version == 0) {
> >> + if (phy->analog == 0) {
> >> bcm43xx_write16(bcm, 0x03E6, 0x0122);
> >> } else {
> >> - if (phy->version >= 2)
> >> - bcm43xx_write16(bcm, 0x03E6, 0x0040);
> >> + if (phy->analog >= 2)
> >> + bcm43xx_write16(bcm, 0x0003, (bcm43xx_read16(bcm, 0x0003)
> >> + & 0xFFBF) | 0x0040);
> >
> > I think here is a specs bug.
>
> This is correct. Why do you think it's a specs bug?
Because
a) The old one made more sense to me.
b) Write MMIO register 0x3? I mean. What is that?
Could this be PHY or radio register 0x3?
--
Greetings Michael.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists