| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20070212.145351.35661569.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:53:51 -0800 (PST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: baruch@...en.org Cc: shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] tcp: remove experimental variants from default list From: Baruch Even <baruch@...en.org> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:12:41 +0200 > The problem is that you actually put a mostly untested algorithm as the > default for everyone to use. The BIC example is important, it was the > default algorithm for a long while and had implementation bugs that no > one cared for. And if our TCP Reno implementation had some bugs, what should we change the default to? This is just idiotic logic. These kinds of comments are just wanking, and lead to nowhere, so please kill the noise. If we have bugs in a particular algorithm, we should just fix them. > As to the reasoning that the new algorithms are supposed to act like > Reno, that needs to be verified as well, it's not evident from the > code itself. If you're not convinced and are intrested enough, then you should go verify whether it is in fact true. This is how things work. If you find that it isn't true, great then we'll know about it and have an opportunity to fix the bug. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists