[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702131730570.14346@cnc.isely.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:32:44 -0600 (CST)
From: Mike Isely <isely@...ly.net>
To: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
cc: Philip Craig <philipc@...pgear.com>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Mike Isely at pobox <isely@...ox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] r8169: more alignment for the 0x8168
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Francois Romieu wrote:
> Philip Craig <philipc@...pgear.com> :
> [...]
> > This patch caused a drop in throughput from 178 Mbits/sec to 135 Mbits/sec
> > on an Intel XScale IXP465.
>
> Which distribution of packet sizes ?
>
> > It seems like there is some confusion about what the align parameter
> > here means. It was originally an offset from an aligned address so that
> > the IP header aligned, and this patch changes it to the alignment of the
> > ethernet header. But align is still set to NET_IP_ALIGN for some chips.
>
> Yes, I should have distinguished both in the first place.
>
> Can you describe which chipset from realtek the board is using (lspci -vxx) ?
>
Francois:
Obviously I have an interest in any change here not breaking the NIC on
my system. So please let me know if/when you'd like me to test drive a
candidate fix that keeps everyone happy...
-Mike
--
| Mike Isely | PGP fingerprint
Spammers Die!! | | 03 54 43 4D 75 E5 CC 92
| isely @ pobox (dot) com | 71 16 01 E2 B5 F5 C1 E8
| |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists