netdev - Re: [GIT PULL] IPv6 Updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200702142119.11304.hasso@estpak.ee>
Date:	Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:19:10 +0200
From:	Hasso Tepper <hasso@...pak.ee>
To:	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki /
	 吉藤英明 
	<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	aramoto@...ux-ipv6.org, kozakai@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] IPv6 Updates

YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
> commit bd292ad1ccbf15c72351f79d4a130dd50da81613
> Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
> Date:   Thu Feb 15 02:07:27 2007 +0900
> 
>     [IPV6] ADDRCONF: Register inet6_dev earlier.
>     
>     Allocate inet6_dev earlier to allow users to set up per-interface variables.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> index c6683ea..42b5cc5 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> @@ -2246,6 +2246,14 @@ static int addrconf_notify(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event,
>  	int run_pending = 0;
>  
>  	switch(event) {
> +	case NETDEV_REGISTER:
> +		if (!idev) {
> +			idev = ipv6_add_dev(dev);
> +			if (!idev)
> +				printk(KERN_WARNING "IPv6: add_dev failed for %s\n",
> +					dev->name);
> +		}
> +		break;
>  	case NETDEV_UP:
>  	case NETDEV_CHANGE:
>  		if (event == NETDEV_UP) {
> 
> ---

Many thanks. Now if only IPv4 would be fixed in similar fashion as well.

Also, this reminds me related issue - "ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): <ifname>: link
is not ready" and "ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): <ifname>: link becomes ready"
messages. While it may look informational, it's extremely annoying in
systems with hundreds and even thousands vlan interfaces.


regards,

-- 
Hasso Tepper
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html